requestId:684c3e4d019852.21276655.
The “National” and “China” Views in China
Author: Zhao Yongchun (Produced by the Department of History, Jilin University of Literature)
Source: “Social Science”, Issue 4, 2021
Abstract:Modern Chinese In the civilization, there are three important meanings of “national”: Guangyi refers to the world, Zhongyi refers to the Jiuzhou and the Four Seas, and Luyi refers to the dynasty countries; the connotation of “China” also has three important meanings: Guangyi refers to the Jiuzhou and the Four Seas, Zhongyi refers to the dynasty countries, and Luyi refers to the Huaxia Han people and the Huaxia region. The “national” of Chinese and Chinese are in line with the connotation of broad and Chinese “China” respectively. China uses “national” to refer to “China” in Jiuzhou and the Four Seas. Although it is a regional concept, it is not composed of “China” and “Four Barbarians” (or “China” and “Four Generations”), but is composed of the Han people and their political rights and their political rights (or the Huaxia region and their political rights and their political rights) and includes all the Chinese and their political rights in Jiuzhou and the Four Seas; predecessors used “national” to refer to to cover the price of a month to dynasty countries. href=”https://twsugardaddy.org/”>Baobao.com Experience “China” is a concept of national political rights, but it includes not only a few ethnic groups under the jurisdiction of the Han dynasty of the Han dynasty of the Han dynasty of the Han dynasty of the Han dynasty, but also a few ethnic groups established by a few ethnic groups. They are not just a single ethnic country, but a multi-ethnic country. Therefore, China’s modern “national” is actually a concept used to refer to the broad “China” and the Chinese “China”. This concept of “national” equals “China”. Although it developed to Cen Ling during the Ming and Qing Dynasties, since the concept of “national” equals “five continents” began to spread to China. “national” equals “world” and “China” were just one of the “national” concepts began to have a potential impact on the Chinese people. The concepts of “national” and “China” overlapping concepts began to collapse. After the establishment of the Chinese People’s Republic of China, the concepts of “national” and “China” finally completed the separation.
Keywords: Modern China; “national”; Jiuzhou; “China”; dynasty countries
The issue of the concept of China’s modern “national” and “China” is how to understand the modern world As a result, it has long become one of the most concerned topics in the academic world, and has published many research results that have attracted widespread attention from the Chinese and foreign academic circles. 1 But although these results believe that the modern “nation” and “China” have thousands of long connections, most of them still believe that the modern “nation” of ChinaThe country refers to the world, composed of “China” and “Four Barbarians” or “China” and “Four Descendants”. It is believed that the concept of “China” refers only to the Han people and their political rights or the Han people and their political rights. “China” is only a part of the “national”, etc. In fact, China is modern. The “national” has three important meanings: broad meaning is used to refer to the world, Chinese meaning is used to refer to the nine states and the four seas, and Chinese meaning is used to refer to dynasties. Although the connotation of China’s modern “China” is many, if you understand it from a multi-level perspective, there are also three important meanings: broad meanings: Yi refers to Jiuzhou and the Four Seas, China refers to dynasty countries, Yi refers to Huaxia areas and Beijing teachers where the Xia and Han people lived. The connotation of “national” in the world (large Jiuzhou) was rarely used in reality, but it has not been effective in “national” Referring to the meaning of the Huaxia Han people and the Huaxia region is equivalent to the meaning of “China”. Therefore, the “national” mentioned by the predecessors has become a concept used to refer to the broad meaning of “China” and “China” in China, and has become the general equivalent of “China” in the actual application of the predecessors彩彩票彩彩彩彩
彩
彩彩
彩彩
彩彩
彩彩
<p Therefore, the author does not avoid rudeness and discusses his own understanding of this problem.
>1. “National” and “China” view of “National” and “China” in Jiuzhou and the Four Seas
China’s modern conception has indeed put forward the concept that “National” is equal to the world, but fewer believers, and more people use “National” to refer to “China”. China modernly uses “National” to refer to “China”, which is divided into two levels. The first level is “National” to refer to “China” in Jiuzhou and the Four Seas. There are many historical materials in this regard.
Warring During the period, Junyan was one of the early scholars who discussed “the whole country”, “Jiuzhou” and “China” along the way. 3 Junyan divided “the whole country” into nine major states, and the “China” as Confucians called “Chin County Shenzhou”, which is only one of the nine major states of “the whole country”. Among the “Nine States of China”, there are eight states like “China”, which later generations called “Nine States”. Although “China” is also divided into “Nine States”, each state is only one-eighty-one of the “Nine States of China”, and is called “Xiao Jiu” by later generations. “Small Kyushu” called “China” also believes that the “Little Kyushu” on all sides is surrounded by sea; the “Big Jiushu” on all sides is surrounded by sea. Among the “National Kyushu” (National Kyushu) and “China’s Kyushu” (Little Kyushu) systems established by Zheng Yan, “National Kyushu” is the “National Kyushu” and refers to the world; and “Little Kyushu” refers to “China”, which is just a part of the “National Kyushu”.
Zheng Yan’s conception of “National Kyushu” was his at that time for the worldAlthough there are certain facts and are used by some masters of the Han Dynasty, 4 However, due to the limitations of the times and technology conditions, most people have not agreed with the “national” concept of Zheng Yan, especially his “national Jiuzhou” (NIzhou) study. For example, Huan Zhu and Wang Chong of the Han Dynasty believed that Zheng Yan was “what they said was strange and delusional.” 5 Although most descendants did not adopt the “national” study of “Did the author of the Jiuzhou have been logically described?” 6 However, few people doubted the “Jiuzhou in China” (Xiaojiuzhou) he said, and believed that the “Jiuzhou in China” (Xiaojiuzhou) that Zheng Yan said was “Jiuzhou in Yu”, which is the “Jiuzhou” recorded in “Shangshu·Yuzhou”. 7 This is also what predecessors said about the “Jiuzhou” and regard this “Jiuzhou” (Little Jiuzhou) as “the whole country”. 8 As the “Travel Notes: Monthly Order” states: “All people who are in the nine states of the country will be able to exert their strength.” 9 The “national” and “nine provinces” are about to merge, and the “nine provinces” are regarded as the “nine provinces”. In the Han Dynasty, Wang Chong said that the book of Zheng Yan said, “The Nine Provinces in “Yu Cang” will only bring the Nine Provinces in the world. They are in the southeast corner and are called Chi County Shenzhou.” 10 Mingming confirmed that the “national” referred to as “big Jiuzhou” is changed to the “national” referred to as “the whole country” referred to as “the big Jiuzhou” by “Yu Cang” to the “little Jiuzhou” referred to as “the whole country”. Xu Guo of Tang Dynasty wrote a comment on “The King of Ages” that “the king of Ages is so dare not not come to the kingdom” that “the kingdom of the country can be said to be the kingdom of the nine provinces.” 11 It is believed that the “moral of the nation” mentioned in “the kingdom of the kingdom” refers to the kingdom of the nine provinces, and it is clearly called “the kingdom” as “the kingdom of the nine provinces”. Chen Yong of the Song Dynasty called “Yuying” “divided the who
發佈留言